.
.
.
.
.
The recent Unlawful activities Prevention Amendment Act 2019
which was passed from parliament amending UAPA Act 1967 to strengthen our
investigation agency.
New Amendment
1) It Give power to Government to designate individual as terrorist.
2) It give power of seizing the properties to NIA with approval from DG(NIA).
3) It give power of investigation to inspector of NIA.
1) It Give power to Government to designate individual as terrorist.
2) It give power of seizing the properties to NIA with approval from DG(NIA).
3) It give power of investigation to inspector of NIA.
Yes it could be
threat to Fundamental rights
1) How can the individual be designated terrorist without court order hence right to life(art 21) and a(19) will be effected.
2) There are no specific guidelines of designating a individual a terrorist hence government could target individual voice against it.
3) There is no time frame as such of cases or abeing released after court order i.e voilation of Right to liberty.
4) Designated terrorist effect not only personal life but social life also.
.1) How can the individual be designated terrorist without court order hence right to life(art 21) and a(19) will be effected.
2) There are no specific guidelines of designating a individual a terrorist hence government could target individual voice against it.
3) There is no time frame as such of cases or abeing released after court order i.e voilation of Right to liberty.
4) Designated terrorist effect not only personal life but social life also.
.
Why it is
justified in national security
1) It provides power to designate a individual a terrorist which would otherwise change organisation name in case organisation is designated a terrorist organisation.
2) It was hurting India image in global order since it itself was not capable of designated a individual a terrorist and was asking other countries to designate them.
3) Sometimes earlier DGP(state) was not giving approval for seizing the properties.
1) It provides power to designate a individual a terrorist which would otherwise change organisation name in case organisation is designated a terrorist organisation.
2) It was hurting India image in global order since it itself was not capable of designated a individual a terrorist and was asking other countries to designate them.
3) Sometimes earlier DGP(state) was not giving approval for seizing the properties.
Government should maintain a balance between individual
liberty and fundamental rights and national security. Hence it should finish
cases as soon as possible along with guidelines to be followed and not as a
tool to stop voice against it.
..